Analysts: Blizzard cannot be rushed into launching StarCraft II, can earn up to US$ 4 million |
Ó
Jess Lubert of Braen Murray posits that: "Even without StarCraft, I think Activision should be able to get to their current guidance for the year. But without StarCraft, getting an upside to that number might be challenging."
Continued Lubert, "The beta testing for StarCraft hasn't started yet. If it starts in August and takes five to six months, then launching the game this year is next to impossible."
So with the possibility that StarCraft II will not hit the late 2009 launch date target, what people can expect is that they will be getting a game that is thoroughly polished and exceeding expectations.
"Nobody (truly nobody) knows how long the StarCraft II beta will take," said Michael Pachter. "It's highly likely that the game is polished, with few or no bugs. The issue is balance, and until there is a large scale beta, Blizzard won't be able to test every single weapon, defense, etcetera, in order to ensure that the three races are perfectly balanced."
That is why it is no surprise that Pachter is predicting that when it does go on sale, it will rake in as much as US$ 4 million in its opening quarter. With Blizzard games, you know that's definitely possible. If the game is to be sold at a wholesale price of US$ 40 (US$ 50 at retail), that would translate to US$ 160 million in revenues for Activision Blizzard. For the operating profit, they can earn as much as US$ 80 million, or 4 cents per share.
"The Blizzard guys are perfectionists, and if they want to take six months, nobody at Activision is going to challenge them," Pachter said matter-of-factly. "So the bottom line is that StarCraft II will launch when Blizzard says so."
On that, I fully agree with him.
Related Articles:
- Blizzard: No LAN multiplayer in StarCraft II to prevent piracy
- Online petition for LAN in StarCraft II goes live
- Video: 7 minutes' worth of StarCraft II multiplayer action
Via Gamasutra
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
Accessories
Artwork
Betas, Testing
Deals
Demo
Drivers
Events
Featured Articles
Genre
Guides, Tips, and Tricks
Hardware
Humor
Interviews
Lore
Mods
News
Off Topic
On Shelves This Week
Opinions & Analysis
Patches
Previews
Reviews
Rumors
Scans
Screenshots
Site News
Steam
Titles
Utilities
Videos
Windows Live
XNA Studio Homebrew
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006

Comments [refresh]
Reread the article.. Couple of missing numbers and like [[ US$ 40 (US$ 50) ]] happening.
And I really don't like Pachter.. He's a professional analyst? What he says usually can be guessed at by the average person, maybe with a bit of research to get the numbers, but really.. he just kinda says publicly what everyone already can assume.
it's wholesale price of US$ 40 (US$ 50 at retail). fixed now.
It'll be done when it's done, just like the DNF said for a decade. Oh wait...