WoW hybridization: Warlocks way too dominant? |
Ó
A recent thread created by Wetdreams of Shattered Hand named the Warlock as the most versatile and useful of classes for World of Warcraft PvP matchups. It clearly reflects in some numbers for the 2 vs 2, 3 vs 3 and even World PvP one on ones, but fails miserably when tagging along with 5 vs 5 bouts in the Arena.
There's a lot warlocks are capable of doing that can counter the effects that enemies may inflict on the class. And as the only class with the best damage over time and direct damage, insane stamina bonuses, pets that not only can tank but can provide buffs for the owner, combinations of spells casted at half the casting time and stack to equate to certain mage spells, life tap that provides an endless source of mana, HP sources from talents, items and dual duty spells...the list is just endless.
The Warlock class may be the captivating epitome of Blizzard's efforts to hybridize the usual RPG classes, but it eventually raises third-party opinions on their class balancing efforts all the same. And even while 5 vs. 5 has the Warlock listed at the bottom of the most effective classes, only a really good strategy is needed to turn the tide to its favor. That time could be up pretty soon.
Is the Warlock way too dominant for PvP? Because if it is, then Blizzard might dust off that nerf bat for another swing. You can almost be pretty sure of it, as community manager Kalgan's comment "orly..." has the Warlocks wary of a class update pretty soon.
Via WoW Forums
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006

Comments
No Comments, be the first to Comment
Add New Comment