More on the Armory's privacy issues |
In response to everyone else who has been complaining about the new Armory - and the fact that there's less privacy there at the moment - WoW Forum member Draena writes that it is in her opinion that it is fine as it is at the moment. Draena notes: "If you care so much about hiding your specs and gear then you have serious issues and this game may not be for you."What's noteworthy here is that other than a few scathing comments, a lot of folks seem to agree with Draena's sentiment. WoW user Muricas had this to add:
In my experience, those most concerned with people knowing how much gold they have, have also been the ones without gold. And those with a lot of gold, for the most part, are not as pestered as one might imagine. Even them, the armory does not show such information.
As for people being able to see your talent spec, what's the big deal?
As for those those who oppose the Armory, and its apparent lack of privacy, WoW Forum member Charsa seems to be the most vocal of them. Charsa notes:
What so many people fail to see is that different people have different levels of desired privacy in their characters, this is their perception (not yours, not Blizzard's) and they have made decisions, inducing investing time and money into the game at their current levels of comfort. This change radically alters that comfort level. While you and maybe Blizzard feel that this is public information, others where under the inference that such was not the case.
Anyhow, we'll update you folks as soon as a "blue" (again, just to be newbie friendly, that means a community manager/Blizzard employee/Blizzard Poster) responds on the thread.
Via WoW Forums
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments
No Comments, be the first to Comment
Add New Comment