The MMO war to build the next World of Warcraft |
Ó
If you thought that the console war was big, you haven't seen anything yet. Say hello to the MMO war.Blizzard and Vivendi Universal's World of Warcraft is being eyed as the most successful of the regular massively multiplayer online role-playing games to date. If that wasn't enough, it is being hailed pretty much as the biggest MMO game ever, in matters of investment. But critics still put EVE Online as the best (and prettiest) of them all.
Until recently, the game industry has been all about multiplayer online play through game matching services, like Ubi.com or GameSpy.
Then came the Korean flurry of MMORPGs - or at least that's what could have started the whole gig. Games such as Ragnarok blew across the Asian region towards the West, where gamers soon found that the tickle of online interactivity was so addictive than solo play.
Western gaming companies soon followed suit, entering their own versions of MMO games, and soon there were thousands of MMOs to go by that could satisfy a hardcore online gamer for lifetimes over. Some were free, others were web-based, many others asked players to pay, while others just wanted you to pay for enhancements to your gaming experiences (interpretation: make you look cool).
The rise of broadband internet and DSL was also another factor to blame. With speed came options. Frequent downloads, more data to share among peers...they all meant one thing: data being passed from one person to another could be seamless, like playing a game against really intelligent AI.
Adding the two factors set gaming giants upon one another on a whole other level of battlefield. With the growing popularity of both microtransactions and subscription-based MMOs, there were many options for game companies to earn a buck. They are just as varied as the types of games there are.
Second Life and Myst Online: Uru Live are two games that are beginning to emphasize the success of introducing newer varieties of MMOs, instead of the usual "powerleveling" games available. Instead of being a game, they would rather you thought of them as...well...your virtual life. If the life you had right now wasn't enough, you could live another one somewhere else.
Then there's the David and Goliath issues. Smaller companies can harbor enough potential to beat even the big game giants in the online wars. It's not all about the money, after all. Games such as Maple Story and Runescape have been constantly keeping huge populations of players online, placing a barrier in their market share. Because both games are in continuous development, like many others, each one has potential to grow even larger.
This year, there is a huge race in capitalizing resources, ideas and concepts to bringing up the "World of Warcraft killer." If there were billions budgeted for the games released this year, you can safely bet that this time around, it just jumped way higher. But you can blow wads on a bad game and it'll still be a bad game. Game critics, even game industry execs, agree that the next MMO blockbuster has to have the perfect recipe: a blend of characters, stories, technology, and gameplay that appeals to billions worldwide.
But the big question looms: who will prevail?
Via Red Herring
2 Jumps Play World of Warcraft Offline
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments
Since the beginning of time story telling has contained one common element; the hero gets the girl. It doesn't matter if he becomes the King of the Universe, does he get the girl? For some odd reason the element of romance is usually totally missing from computer games, or at best is handled very poorly. I'm not talking about sex, (though a little goes a long way), I'm talking about romance, relationships between adults that grow, evolve, have ups and downs, the whole thing. The Sims is moving in that direction. Many games go in that direction with pets, amimal companions that can be used in combat tactics, where the player designs his pet as a tank, or for offense, to compliment the player's abilities. Take the idea much further, a partner who becomes the story. The partner can be the major source of quests, as well as an emotional, strategic, and tactical team mate. That young woman that the player saved from certain death gradually unfolds her story as a princess in hiding from usupers to the throne, etc, and the player is her hero. A key element would have to be the quality of the story telling. A good story teller can make a shy kiss on the cheek worth all the gold in the bank. Her personality has to grow and be a continual source of reward to the player. In this way the story can be sturctured without the player feeling that freedom of action is lost. Any game that pulls this off would be a huge success. Even a duplicate WoW, with this feature added, would soon leave WoW in the dust. Quality throughout the story telling would be the key, with the relationship being the ultimate reward.
My apologies for being sexist, naturally the game would allow for equal treatment of both sexes.
Add New Comment