Cryptic Studios delivers promise: first Star Trek Online gameplay footage unveiled |
Ó
As promised, Cryptic Studios unveiled the very first gameplay trailer for their upcoming massively multiplayer online game based on the popular science-fiction universe, Star Trek Online. Making an appearance along with Cryptic chief creative officer Jack Emmert for the presentation at the Star Trek Convention held in Las Vegas was actor Leonard Nimoy, the original officer Spock in the television series. From what's been revealed thus far, Star Trek Online is set in the year 2049, and players can choose to play as either a Federation or Klingon captain.
The very first trailer shown is claimed to be comprised entirely of in-game engine gameplay footage, so we guess that's a pretty solid indication of what things we might expect from the title. You can view it by heading to the Star TrekOnline official website.
Related Star Trek Online articles:
Via IGN
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - December
| Most Commented | |
| NPD Study: US kids as youn.. | (37) |
| More Estavillo subpoenas -.. | (23) |
| Erik Estavillo subpoenas B.. | (10) |
| Valve looking at MMORPG sc.. | (3) |
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
2049? Uhh...no?