Posted Sep 13, 2006 at 09:04AM by Pranav T Listed in: PlayStation 3 Tags: Sony, SCEA, SOE, Xfire
Ó

XfireAfter what many might call an eternity, there seemed to be some shiny skies for Sony and the PlayStation 3 fans. Now a counterpart of Xbox Live can never be bad. While it might have not been as comprehensive and cool as Xbox Live, the PS3 fans would probably still have a lot to cheer about.

Well, sorry to break the bubble here, but it seems that it is not to be. Representatives of Sony Computer Entertainment America have hurriedly refuted the earlier reports. They're saying that although there is a kind of collaboration between SCEA and Viacom (Xfire), it's currently only limited to a single game - Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom.

That entry in the PC version of Xfire about this title suddenly makes sense, doesn't it? And the fact is that Xfire's presence isn't confirmed in Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom either! Here's the official quotes from unnamed SCEA representatives:

This proposed deal is completely separate and independent from the PlayStation Network Platform, and is something that SOE was examining specifically for Dark Kingdom."

“We can confirm that Sony Online Entertainment is in talks with Viacom and Xfire for a single, specific PS3 game. However, there are no announcements at this time regarding any discussions between SCEA, Viacom and Xfire.”

"Xfire is not part of the PlayStation Network Platform. We are in discussions with Sony Online Entertainment, but I cannot comment any further."


Now they aren't flatly denying the presence of Xfire in the core network platform; It's presence is still clouded by doubt. We guess we can only wait and see what the future about the network platform holds for the PlayStation 3 fans. I, for one, would love to see the presence of a unified network platform; something on the lines of Xbox Live. Let's just hope for the best.


[Via Gamasutra] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


32 Comments


Sort by:
   by non fanboy (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » i said it before and ill say it again...

FREE online = CRAP!!!
good luck SONY!!!

   by Homer (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » I agree with #1

I like to pay on $400 for a system and pay $50 a year for the life of the system. I also like to buy more HDD to make my system backwards compatiable. I also think that Blue Ray is stupid, I mean how much space does a game need. The fact that your system will never be backwards compatiable if you don't have a Gold membership is cool to. I also want to add that wi-fi is stupid. Don't forget HDMI, at least they give us a choice!

What else do these guys say....GOW is going to look better then all PS3 games. I admit that GOW looks good but that's b/c it's created on the Unreal Engine. Anything that is on that Engine is going to look pretty good (the 360 cannot take credit for that).

Why are so many 360 guys going out of there way to hate on the PS3.

   by PSOWNED (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » again?

man it is just blow after blow to the sony fan base...or whats left of them. sorry guys i really feel for ya. sort of.

   by Moonpie (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Haha

"man it is just blow after blow to the sony fan base...or whats left of them. sorry guys i really feel for ya. sort of."

Talking is all you can do really.
X360 is selling WORSE than the original Xbox. I wonder if Microsoft will pass the sales of the original Xbox (which was 24 million) to begin with. Comparing it to Sony's 100 million + is a riot.

Blow after blow indeed.
All that matters is that Sony still has the great game library they've always had/same titles, and Scratchbox 360 still doesnt.

   by 0101010101 (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Who cares.

Lol you ppl really need to grow up and get your brains bigger then a 5 yr. old's. Sony haves been and is makeing there own online for PS3 and it going to be better then xbox live or anything else.

Just wait till tgs. Geez seems tgs going to make all you dumb lieing inmature rude ppl be very suprise.

I wont be at all tho because I'm not dumb and I know PS3 gonna own, lol. With 27 playable games at tgs for PS3 and show everything for PS3 online and PS3 final specs and what the RSX really is and it's final specs is gonna be outstanding but wont surpise me at all but seems it will alot of you dumb ppl out there, lol.

Really ppl... get smart, lol.

   by 0101010101 (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Hey wait a min...

This must mean untould legends dark kingdom is online.
They did'nt say anything about it being online did they?

So new info sould be comeing soon like a new interview talking about it online or something or at tgs, lol.

   by Vecha - 2006-09-13
 » wow...

starting to look just like the ps2 online...different ways of playing online for each and every games....


I'd love to see sony sell 100 million consoles this year...now that would be a riot.

"Blow after blow indeed.
All that matters is that Sony still has the great game library they've always had/same titles, and Scratchbox 360 still doesnt."

really now? You think the ps3 will have a great library? I'm guessing you are a sony fanboy that has NO clue what is coming to the 360 compared to the ps3...right?


Go do some research dumbass fanboy #65043

   by non fanboy (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » how is that hating??

Im just stating the fact that free online = CRAP!!
The PS2 proved that...didnt it?!! GIVE me a list of games, other than SOCOM and Madden that had GREAT ONLINE!!

TEKKEN? (never existed) Gran Turismo? (mia)

wanna know why? cause sony had ppl with dial up and dsl playing all on the same server...and it was FREE!!
which meant it SUCKED to play online. RIGHT??!!

xbox and 360 got LIVE...and it forces u to have a fast connection (cable or DSL) ....meaning a fast and lag free online experience.

and dont get me mixed up with a fanboy!! fanboys are BROKE ppl that cant AFFORD to buy another console so they go around CHEERLEADING for what ever company they choose. I have bought and OWNED all systems and enjoy every perk that it can give me. I have the psp,ps2, xbox and 360...im gonna get a PS3, no doubt. Only thing i question is the FREE online from SONY...I dont think it will work. and as for the blu ray vs hd dvd biz....I dont really give a phuck!! just give me a damn good game to play!!

   by Advertising -
   by Rich (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13

When PS2 was released online gameing was nothing it was now... There are already have video of the online interface and you can do everything that the 360 can do

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mq5job_en0

and also at #7... do you really think that you can say 360 has a better line up than PS3?? How can 360 compete with FFXIII, Devil May Cry 4. Resident Evil 5, Grand Turismo, R:FOM, Killzone, and Heavenly Sword..... What does Xbox have besides Halo 3 and Gears of War??


   by Fin (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Hmnnn

"really now? You think the ps3 will have a great library? I'm guessing you are a sony fanboy that has NO clue what is coming to the 360 compared to the ps3...right?"

What makes you think they wont? Launch titles aren't always the best and that counts for almost every other system out there. Even the 360 had horrible launch games. Launch games however don't tell squat about what games will come out in the future. If you think like that, you might as well call yourself a fanboy. With all the popular franchises Sony has and will most likely make an apperance on the new systems, those already make up a good future library. Of course there are possible new titles that will do just as good. You can't rule out something that hasn't come out yet.


   by DP (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13

What I cant understand is:

ALL the people out there saw Sony getting one thing after another wrong.
But anyone is still saying: "Yeah, the TGS will turn the Sony World arround!"

I cant understand that. 30+ Games to play when there was not ONE game to play at the GC? Mhhh...

Ether Sony IS actually hating Europe or you all will be proven wrong at the TGS when sony will dissapoint all those Fans out there again.

I hope that the PS3 will be a good console. And I hope they actually have a good online plan.

But in a realistic way, it seems more and more like it is going to be the same like the PS2. Hope Sony wont screw up this time. Cause Online is everything.

If I imagine Test Drive Unlimited without the Online Feature... damn. Kick it in the bucket.

And I also hope that relying on a brand new Technologie (bluray that is) isnt going to be a serious mistake. But we will see at the TGS, right ;-)

Yeah, like EVERYTHING will be so much better after the TGS. Right.



PEACE

   by 0101010101 (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Lmfao.

Sony always haves better and more games and aaa games then xbox or any other console ever did.

And ps2 online crap????? LMFAO!!!!! PS2 online is great and it freakin free.

It can freakin handle 32 players online with alot of action going on and with rides.

Also to name one game for PS2 online... battlefield 2 modren combat. I never get lag on that game with all 24 players in a room on any game mode.

I do sometimes like maybe once a monuth or very less and it does it just for a sec or you get disconnected from the server.

But all games do that for all consoles that you can play games online and pc. And saying how ps2 games haveing there own diff thing for online instead of... LMFAO you must be very dumb lol.

I mean pc games do that... all of them do. Very few uses the same online thing. But really it not a bad thing at all.

And there patchs and updates for games on PS2 and you can chat online when playing the game and text message ppl and have a freind list and clan and all that stuff if the game supports it.

Match makeing and everything. Look at R: deadzone, battlefield 2 modren combat, star wars battlefront 1 and 2.

All great online PS2 games with alot of those things I jsut said and more. IT would take a total fool to make fun of PS2 online because it really like pc games but can only support 32 players online max for PS2.

And it all free just like all pc games too... I think just besides mmorpgs and those are pay to play always or almost always?

No matter what console or pc. And really saying PS3 dont have good games or saying xbox360 got better games... LMFAO again.

PS3 haves better games then any xbox360 game or any other console game. PS3 even haves better games then pc games.

But pc also haves good games but not really going next gen anytime soon, lol. But really I tell it how it is and PS3 haves the best games, graphics, tech, and all and PS3 already won the console war and totally will and out sell the other consoles by far and pc will also haves good games.

Really xbox360 not gonna get any good games. Only PS3 is and pc games. Unless you like dumb games that suck.

With poor graphics and gameplay and all, lol.
But PS3 will and already haves the best games and aaa games and first gen PS3 games look must better then xbox360 2th gen gay graphic games, lol.

Were there aaa games huh? NONE that's right. Halo will be the only aaa game for xbox360 that is my guess and if there any more halos after that.

But really... that game sucks.

   by lawl (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » you can expect a lot more people on sony's online network

a lot of people were angry about having to buy a network adapter for ps2, so a lot those people skipped it. but ps3 has a built in ethernet port no matter what.


it's safe to say that more people shall playz ps3 online than ps2 online.

   by non fanboy (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » To # 12

How can anyone take you seriously?!! You cant even SPELL or have PROPER GRAMMER to even say anything!!

example: PS3 haves better games then any xbox360 game or any other console game. PS3 even haves better games then pc games.

haves or has??

ya damn RETARD!!

Good for SONY to have a RETARD fighting for them!!

hahahhaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!

   by inter (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13

its the internet ***** grammer
were not in skool

   by XboxHater (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » to 14.

Oh sorry teacher... You should be at the school posting section. I think you don't understand that english are not the primairy language of evereybody. ($%?&*)

On the subject, i think sony are not stupid and they will offer a better online service than Xbox live. Even if it's free! Don't forget that they have made a big servey base on gamers.

PS3 will Rock!!! 6X6 (sixaxis)

   by Vecha - 2006-09-13
 » hmmm..lol

"and also at #7... do you really think that you can say 360 has a better line up than PS3?? How can 360 compete with FFXIII, Devil May Cry 4. Resident Evil 5, Grand Turismo, R:FOM, Killzone, and Heavenly Sword..... What does Xbox have besides Halo 3 and Gears of War?? "

Research my dead Moron. Research. Go find out what is for the 360 besies Halo and GOW. You will find out that RE5 is coming to the 360 along with the ps3, you will find there are a million racings games that could be matched to GT and for FF13...there are abou5 5-10 Japanese RPGS that are coming out before or around the same time as FF13.

"What makes you think they wont? Launch titles aren't always the best and that counts for almost every other system out there. Even the 360 had horrible launch games. Launch games however don't tell squat about what games will come out in the future. If you think like that, you might as well call yourself a fanboy. With all the popular franchises Sony has and will most likely make an apperance on the new systems, those already make up a good future library. Of course there are possible new titles that will do just as good. You can't rule out something that hasn't come out yet."

First and Foremost, A fanboy has a preference and knows nothing about the other side. You don't obviously. "the 360 launched sucks just as much" really now? 19 launch titles compared to 13 for the ps3? mmmk whatever.

"a better future library" $600 bucks to sit and wait for these games to come out? Don't get me wrong i'll be getting a ps3...but what sony is doing...is REtarded! 2 months till launch and we HAVE YET TO SEE A GOD DAMN GAME PLAYED or a *****ing demo. Not one Full game. Zip Nadda!

The blindness I see in your sonyites just amaze me. "ff13 is gonna come out with the ps3! So i don't Care! DMC is gonna come out! So i don't care!"

If sony packed ***** in a box and told you, "this ***** will turn into gold in a year!" you would buy it.

And again...you think i'm "ruling" out the ps3. I'm not. I'm *****ing because they are the worst at handling things.

Ninty and Microsoft do a better job of showing us GAMES then the "other *****" that comes with it.

I'm buying a game console. Not a media center.


   by Advertising -
   by Random Gamer (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » #16

>"On the subject, i think sony are not stupid and they will offer a better online service than Xbox live."

LOL!

As good as XBox live? Maybe, maybe not, but even if it's not, it would still be a HUGE improvement over the PS2 online.

But better than XBox Live? Come on, that's the fanboy in you talking. :)

   by Vecha - 2006-09-13
 » You my Good Sir Are a MORON

"Oh sorry teacher... You should be at the school posting section. I think you don't understand that english are not the primairy language of evereybody. ($%?&*)

On the subject, i think sony are not stupid and they will offer a better online service than Xbox live. Even if it's free! Don't forget that they have made a big servey base on gamers. "

You think sony are not stupid? Sony IS stupid! The "better" online service will be just like the ps2.

It'll suck.

but for someone like you, who is blind, and cries to their mommy whenever they need something. I'm sure you'll enjoy.

I like how you say the ps3 has better games....and don't even list them.

   by comedy - 2006-09-13
 » oh my

i leave for 5 minutes and xbots start to take over!!

lol... dude, i quote: "How can anyone take you seriously?!! You cant even SPELL or have PROPER GRAMMER to even say anything!!"... you can't criticise this guy's spelling when you can't spell (check it, it's spelled GRAMMAR).
anyway, as someone said: this is the internet grammar and spelling have no place, simply opinions.
and that guy's obviously not speaking in his native tongue, that's hard.

i have to just say this:
the point in there being better games on ps3 is that it HAS ff13 not just 'another jap rpg' and it HAS mgs4 not just another 'stealth 'em up' and it has... etc (think GT, DMC, God of War etc) - these are exclusives and they are better games than the other games in their genre... so saying 'well 360 has like 5 rpgs coming out' is not valid, ps3 has ff13 - this is enough to kill any other 5 rpgs.

there were playable demos at e3, many games have been shown off for ps3 - playable!

people saying 'oh it'll turn out like ps2' as if that's a bad thing! don't you recall the ps2 outselling the xbox by an enormous amount... oh and it's still selling, with games still being made for it. (kind of makes me glad i didn't waste my money on the xbox)


ok, i was quite excited to hear xfire was doing sony's online - it works, and is really quite good. this news is a shame, but it doesn't mean sony are going to fail wrt its online component.
microsoft have set the bar high, but sony are the kings of ripping-off-and-improving... and so there's a good chance 'playstation hub' will be good.
i only ever played online games on the pc, and i have to say i enjoy it... the system having multiple servers run all over the place works well. i do waste a lot of time on cs:s.




ok, now although i have said ff13 is better than 'generic jap rpg' i don't deny that 360 will have some standout titles of its own: Gears of war is shaping up well, and halo3 can't really fail, there are some others but i don't really know them... but they never appealed to me, i know squeenix - they won't let me down with ff13, i know kojima - he won't let me down with mgs4... i also have played halo and didn't like it (i'm one for m/k, not controllers).
there's no need to be rude in order to convey a point, in fact it undermines your own credibility.
peace out chaps

   by Vecha - 2006-09-13
 » lol

Rudeness is great. Its the internet. If someone gets offended...well they can just bugger off.

"the point in there being better games on ps3 is that it HAS ff13 not just 'another jap rpg' and it HAS mgs4 not just another 'stealth 'em up' and it has... etc"

Ok...so nothing original? mmk. MGS i'll take that as an amazing games...but FF?...that has gone in the dirt since ff10...even the creator of the ones before that has left and gone with the 360 and making 3 Japanese RPGS. Blue Dragon, Lost Odyssey, and forgot the other one.

Along with the same creators who were behind Chrono Cross(and/or trigger)

If you call this "just another 'jap' rpg then your a moronic fanboy.

" saying 'well 360 has like 5 rpgs coming out' is not valid, ps3 has ff13 - this is enough to kill any other 5 rpgs."

But we have yet to even see ff13. We have seen more Blue Dragon and Lost oddyssey. I think there is more valid info on the 360 side of things then your "THIS GAME WAS AWESOME THE LAST TIME...SO IT'LL BE AWESOME THIS TIME"...ok sure fanboy.

"here are some others but i don't really know them"

then do some research. I know about the playstation games(because I am getting them I just like to ***** in order to voice my opinion so the next consoles aren't just a remake of the last...which is what it feels like for the 360 and ps3....the wii....don't know what to say really)

The least you could do is know the steller games for the 360. I know the ones for the ps3.




   by Vecha - 2006-09-13
 » one other thing

"i was quite excited to hear xfire was doing sony's online "

they won't be. And this proves that the ps3 online will most likely end up like the ps2.

Only untold Legends is getting Xfire...the other games are going on the "PSN" whatever that means.

I think for consoles is should be more uniformed...instead of using xfire for this game...psn for this game...another prog. for this game...it just gets rediculous...sure xfire for all would be great...like most have on their comps...but xfire for just that one game...cmon...

   by Mleep (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » What?

"I hope that the PS3 will be a good console. And I hope they actually have a good online plan.

But in a realistic way, it seems more and more like it is going to be the same like the PS2. Hope Sony wont screw up this time. "

What the...?
Are you saying being like the PS2 is a bad thing? o.o'
It had all the big games (and it seems history is repeating itself) and it sold 100 million units.

I would only wish that teh PS3 would follow in its footsteps, and it seems to be doing that.

However they may disappoint people, it wont change the fact taht all the big titles are again available for Sony's console.
If you want those games, not even X360 is an option.

   by Moonpie (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Moop

"really now? You think the ps3 will have a great library? I'm guessing you are a sony fanboy that has NO clue what is coming to the 360 compared to the ps3...right?"

If you concider the fact that Sony sold 100 million consoles (compared to Microsofts 24 million) BECAUSE of those games, and that they are again appearing on Sony's console, not Microsofts, you may want to rethink that.
Personally I found Xbox game library extremely lacking, and whether or not those games are good is in the eyes of the beholder. But a huge majority bought sony's consoles because of their game library.
PS3 is getting many of those games again, while Xbox360 so far has gotten none, zero, zipp.
Though Resident Evil 5 thats coming out later is one exception. Microsft needs more strong titles.
I'm not a Sony fanboy, I simply don't like the kind of games (majority of them) that are released for Xbox, but I do for Sonys console. Its just a matter of taste.

   by Vecha - 2006-09-13
 » again you are blind

"
If you concider the fact that Sony sold 100 million consoles (compared to Microsofts 24 million) BECAUSE of those games, and that they are again appearing on Sony's console, not Microsofts, you may want to rethink that.
Personally I found Xbox game library extremely lacking, and whether or not those games are good is in the eyes of the beholder. But a huge majority bought sony's consoles because of their game library.
PS3 is getting many of those games again, while Xbox360 so far has gotten none, zero, zipp.
Though Resident Evil 5 thats coming out later is one exception. Microsft needs more strong titles.
I'm not a Sony fanboy, I simply don't like the kind of games (majority of them) that are released for Xbox, but I do for Sonys console. Its just a matter of taste.

"

You obviously don't know all that is on/coming to the 360.

Let's take a history lesson show we fanboy.

Do the past of a console have ANYthing to do with its future?

I would think not, seeing as ninty was once the number one console...and last year was last. And sega was highly suscessful and now is history as far as console goes.

Stronger titles? Lost Odyssey? Blue Dragon? Splinter Cell? Jade Empire 2? Oblivion? Mass Effect?

RE5 is the only exception because it has the grace of going onto the ps3 also? right?

whatever man.

   by Fin (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Vecha

Dude, your seriously not even giving the PS3 a chance with that kind of attitude. You call other people being blind, but you already cast a blind eye to the PS3. Sure what they may have announced now may not interest you but the damn console is barely being launced this year.

"Do the past of a console have ANYthing to do with its future?"

Not really, but something as big as the PS2 that sold 100 million consoles does show something formidable. I mean do you expect those customers that bought and were (assumingly) happy with their console that had numerous memorable franchises to suddenly hate it? Sure it might have a bad launch and many fans may defect to the 360, but I don't see the PS3 crashing and burning just becase of an initial stumble in the race.

I also wanted to write some things towards the "stronger titles" that you listed but those kinds of arguments have been done to death by now so I leave it at that.

As the saying goes, "to each their own" and I respect whatever decesion you make towards what console, if not both, that you get. Personally, I've already tried the 360 at my friend's house and I'm not impress. I'm getting the PS3 not by some blind "fanboyism" but because the product interests ME as a gamer.

   by non fanboy (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » 100 million PS2 units sold....

Moonpie wrote: If you concider the fact that Sony sold 100 million consoles (compared to Microsofts 24 million).....

have u ever thought that they sold that many units because it was a faulty machine?!! I myself went thru 3 Ps2's and I have the same xbox eversince launch day. This is not an isolated incident either..I have many friends, relatives, etc...that went thru the same deal. Cmon sony fanboys..tell me that u still have the same PS2 that u originally got...I DARE YA!!

Think about this....If u think that the bluray movie player for the PS3 is a good idea...think again!! Every movie that u watch and all of the playing time that u spend on your new PS3 WILL WEAR DOWN that PS3 of yours. $600 dollars cheap for a game player and a movie player?? Sure it is...at the first run, but a bit expensive if u have to buy another one cause u over used the first one. I myself like to play games and games only! I like the fact that Microsoft gave a "choice" if i wanted a movie player or not.
"THINK ABOUT THAT SONY FANBIOTCHES"

I can already picture SONY now in the future....
" Sorry for your PS3 to be broken, but we are not responsible for consumers over using the PS3...We suggest that u watch a movie then wait the next day to play another game or a movie...thank you.."

   by Advertising -
   by Vecha - 2006-09-13
 » haha

"I'm getting the PS3 not by some blind "fanboyism" but because the product interests ME as a gamer."

yes you are. You are buying it in HOPES that they get more games. The system is launching with less then 13 games. That is sad. A disgrace to gamers.

And non-fanboy I wouldn't doubt that the "100 million conosols" may have some indication of faulty machines...I went thru four consoles..and not because i didn't take care of them...i've had the same xbox, xbox360, GC, N64 since launch...workked like a charm

   by comedy - 2006-09-13
 » ok

i don't really want to get into a fight here, i am not quite so enraged by the idea of someone liking 360 more than ps3, but i also don't take kindly to someone completely ignoring sound reasoning and well thought out arguments.

look, vecha you need to read someone's comment properly before laying into them...

i stand by my assessment that FF is a great series, i have played almost every iteration (apart from the ds ones) and have enjoyed all of them. ff12 (that was made 'after ffx') scored 40/40 in a famitsu review, i'm quite excited to get my hands on that! now, we don't know a great deal about ff13 but i have some faith... just like you're probably quite sure that halo3 will be good.


arguments which say that sony sold 100 million ps2's because everyone bought 3 or 4 are simply ridiculous, and i hope you were joking (i'm afraid i can't tell anymore). i bought my ps2 2nd hand and it's still fine - that's right, that means sony recorded ONE unit sold, but 2 people have 'owned' it...

i don't think the launch list is 13, i'm quite sure it's more than that.
yes, i have looked at the xbox 360's 'standout' games, but FOR ME none of them really stood out... i have read the odd review and considered them, but i can't say they have me at all interested.


the past has a lot to do with the present and the future, you should know that! yes, there are lessons to be learnt - the higher you climb the further you are going to fall - but sony can take note of that... i'm not saying ps3 is a definite winner (god knows the odds are continually climbing against them) but they have a very strong brand name, some good technology, a sound plan, and most importantly they have some great 3rd party support.
this xmas will be interesting, 360 should have got its foot in the door by now, and won't have anythign to prove - it will simply sell. ps3 will be the newbie and will have to justify its price.



can you see how a discussion is supposed to work? you must consider the other side's position aswell as your own.
and vecha, you may like insulting people, but i save that for someone who deserves it.

   by Fin (Unregistered) - 2006-09-13
 » Sigh to Vecha

Dude, you are pretty ingorant of other people's opinions. I didn't go "OMFG I WANT THE PS3 CAUSE IT OWNZRSZZZZ". I said it interests me. I love the PS2, I see its potential and I can care less about their, and any other consoles launch title, because I mentioned earlier that I feel all launch titles typically "suck". As a console matures, so does the opportunity for their line up of games to grow and mature. You however have already put a conclusion to a console that hasn't even had the chance to start from its starting gate yet. I tried my best to respect yours, but I can care less now with your inconsiderate replies.

"yes you are. You are buying it in HOPES that they get more games. The system is launching with less then 13 games. That is sad. A disgrace to gamers."

Really who the hell are you to think you know how I think? You really are a fanboy. Stop being a hypocrite.

Kiddos to comedy.



The QJ.net Network RSS Feeds
QJ Forums
PC Gaming
Sony PSP
PlayStation 3
Xbox 360
Nintendo DS
Nintendo Wii
Blog of Blogs Feed / PDA
QJ.NET RSS / PDA
Gaming Consoles Feed / PDA
Nintendo DS RSS / PDA
PlayStation 3 RSS / PDA
PSP Updates RSS / PDA
Wii RSS / PDA
Xbox 360 RSS / PDA
PC Gaming Feed / PDA
MMORPG RSS / PDA
Personal Computer Games RSS / PDA
World of Warcraft RSS / PDA
Technology Feed / PDA
Apple RSS / PDA
iPhone - iPod Touch RSS / PDA
Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!