Posted Nov 19, 2006 at 06:47AM by Mabie A. Listed in: PlayStation 3 Tags: EA Sports, Mexico
Ó

Pacman


To those of you who are true boxing fans, we're sure you know of the third fight between Pacquiao of the Philippines and Morales of Mexico. And for sure, you would have watched the bout, since it is decisive of who will meet Barrera to fight for the WBC Super Featherweight Title.

Given that Pacquiao KO'd Morales at 2:57 into the third round at last night's fight, we know he will be battling it out with Barrera. Now, we still don't know when the epic event will be. But as early as now, anticipation is high for the next meeting of these two great fighters.

But although that fight won't be for another year or so, there's no need to pout 'cause we have here 15 brand new screenshots of EA's Fight Night Round 3. Now, it ain't the real thing, but this is the closest you can get to the action until the real fight. These are close-up screens of great fighters slamming their fists into their opponent's faces to high heavens. Yeah, there's sure a lot of sweat and faces flying about. Sweet, huh?

Anyway, it's never too early to start warming up for a sport as physically demanding as boxing, even if it's just for a video game. So get out those gloves and start hitting!

more fight night action - Image 1 more fight night action - Image 2 more fight night action - Image 3 more fight night action - Image 4 

more fight night action - Image 5 more fight night action - Image 6 more fight night action - Image 7 more fight night action - Image 8 

more fight night action - Image 9 more fight night action - Image 10 more fight night action - Image 11 more fight night action - Image 12 

more fight night action - Image 13 more fight night action - Image 14




[Via gamefront] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


11 Comments


Sort by:
   by PS1PS2PSPPS3 (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » that sucks...

This game looks better on the 360, really...

:(


   Re: .. (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » ..

Yeah this game looks way better on 360, agreed. This game is way too old and has been out for ages, I won't be purchasing for ps3

   Re: julesno1 (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » 360

I played and beat this game on 360 and I think that it was amazing. Just the game can be much better, it is a bit repetitive and packed with ads, like burger king. Anyways they probably just tweaked the game a bit, so I suggest you wait for the fourth one.
   by somewhere (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » nice graphics!

viva filipinas! :) go pacman! go pacman! go pacman!

   by Shatterdome - 2006-11-19
 » The game

Is damned awesome, and I love it...just got bored of it after awhile...

Other then the enhanced muscles and veins, the models look about the same...but the muscles in veins do add to it, me likes.

I am noticing very small or no Depth of Field for the BG audience(hard to say cause of .jpg res), which is pretty weak, but entirely possible.

Whereas the PS3 can use cell to increase the amount of geometrey it has a very small amount of bandwidth on it's framebuffer (the place where 360 has the 256 gb/s edram) and is going to suffer in the special effects department...which i've already heard reviewers talking about in games that where multi-platform.....


   Re: ffaldjk (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » ok so..

xbox 360 has 256 gb/s edram.... and whats the bandwidth for the ps3 with its 256mb xdr(clocked at 3.2ghz) and 256mb of gdd3(550-700mhz) ram that can be freely accessed on both the rsx and cell processor? the gdd3

   Re: ffaldjk (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » sorry for the double post

sorry for the double post first off,

the gddr3 vram(550/700 mhz) is set for direct access from the RSX while the XDR(3.2Ghz) is set for direct access from the Cell... the bandwidth is far greater than the measly 48gb/s youve stated... if you take the math you used to get the 256 gb/s for the 360 then the ps3 would have approx 307gb/s.



heres a good thread to read xbots and its on your own forums too:

http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?t+364632

   Re: Gamez (Unregistered) - 2006-11-21
 » Old and pointless link ffaldjk.

That link dates back to August LAST YEAR, and if you look again, it's actually from an editorial on the Playstation website psinext.e-mpire.com! So please don't suggest it's unbiased.

The edram in the 360 IS of huge benefit and will enable the 360 to perform bandwidth intensive operations which would choke the PS3.

Anyway, please note that posts on QJ seems to change the equals character into + for some reasons, which has happened to your link.
   by Advertising -
   by Anonymous Coward Who Really Has An Account (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » WTF?!

No way in hell does the 360 version look better. Are you guys *****en blind or some *****?! The 360's looks like crap and you should be ashamed of yourself to say it looks better on that console. PS3 FTW!!!!!!!!

Go Pacman!


   Re: skylar (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » no

thats nice that youre a fanboy for sony and everything, but that doesnt mean that every game they make is better. the 360 version really does look better, and its over a year old too. to be honest i havent seen a single ps3 game that looks better than its 360 counterpart, and thats my honest opinion, no fanboyism here.
   by lol (Unregistered) - 2006-11-19
 » lol

^fanboy



Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!