Posted Sep 03, 2006 at 05:17PM by Ian C. Listed in: Science Tags: pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, genetic engineering, DNA
Ó

Custom BabyHave you guys seen the movie Gattaca? Well a growing number of couples have been using pre-implantation genetic diagnosis or PGD to detect a genetic predisposition of an embryo to health risks like cancer and genetic defects.

Parents who want to benefit from PGD must first undergo the same in vitro fertilization process that infertile couples turn to. Eggs from mommy are fertilized by sperm form daddy in a petri dish. When the resulting embryos are three days old, doctors analyze the DNA. Only embryos without the defective genes they are looking for are considered as candidates for implantation into mommy's uterus. Basically, parents are starting to test all their "kids" on a petri dish before they decide if they want to continue having them.

The process is both expensive and difficult. The out-of-pocket costs alone often exceed $25,000. Also, due to the fact that embryos are selected for their genetic status instead of which embryos are healthiest, the chances for the embryo to successfully develop is less. There is still the concern that the removal of a cell from a three day old embryo can cause long term problems.

Despite the costs and the dangers, more and more future-minded couples are signing up for the process. Some couples have said that the mere probability that their children can have a future that is free from cancer far outweigh the costs. It's not just cancer; inherited defects such as predispositions towards tumors, arthritis, and obesity can be curbed.

Critics fear that PGD could eventually become a genetic class divide between the rich and the poor. "From a technology perspective we can test anything," said Mark Hughes, director of the Genesis Genetics Institute in Detroit. "The issue becomes what is considered serious enough to warrant such testing and who decides that." Scientists are currently considering if this is a 'wonderful thing' or if it is genetic engineering.

Well, what do you guys think? One step towards Gattaca, or a blessing for all those families plagued by inherited health problems?


[Via NY Times] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


1 Comments


Sort by:
   by Advertising -
   by Max F. (QJ. NET Staff) - 2006-09-03

So they basically grow you a bunch of 3-day-old babies-to-be in a jar. Then they take the one that won't have cancer. Then they throw the other embryos away?

Hm. Liberal people will see this as an advancement in science.

Conservatives will look at it as abortion on a massive scale.



Featured Content
QJ.NET Blog Network RSS Feeds
MyQJ Feed / PDA
MyQJ RSS / PDA
Blog of Blogs Feed / PDA
QJ.NET RSS / PDA
Gaming Consoles Feed / PDA
Nintendo DS RSS / PDA
PlayStation 3 RSS / PDA
PSP Updates RSS / PDA
Wii RSS / PDA
Xbox 360 RSS / PDA
PC Gaming Feed / PDA
Age of Conan RSS / PDA
Games for Windows RSS / PDA
MMORPG RSS / PDA
Tabula Rasa RSS / PDA
World of Warcraft RSS / PDA
Science Feed / PDA
Science RSS / PDA
Technology Feed / PDA
Apple RSS / PDA
Gadgets RSS / PDA
Mobile RSS / PDA
Photography RSS / PDA
Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!